Tyre MINERVA EMIZERO HP 165/65R14 79T
Tyre MINERVA EMIZERO HP 165/65R14 79T
Tyre MINERVA EMIZERO HP 165/65R14 79T

Minerva - EMIZERO HP 165/65 R14 79T

4.6 17 Customer Reviews
Model EMIZERO HP
Size ? 165/65R14 79T
Load Index ? 79
Speed Index ? T
Availability
Just 4 more in stock for $52, hurry!
Notify me when re-stocked?
EU Label ?
70
Product Details

Vehicle Type Passenger car

Usage pdp-details-vehicle-usage-SUMMER

Brand MINERVA

Model EMIZERO HP

Width 165

Height 65

Construction R (Tyre of radial construction)

Diameter 14

Load Index 79

Speed Index T (max. vehicle speed 190 Km/h)

Our Fitting Service

How it works

Select a local fitting partner

Prices start at $15 per tyre. Enter your postcode to see your local fitter's prices for your car.

We will ship the tyre directly to the fitter

The fitter will contact you to arrange fitting

Quick delivery after your purchase

Find your nearest fitting partner

Postcode must be 4 digits
Customer Reviews (17)
  • October 10th, 2016
    These were the only available option for my 1979 Subaru. Top marks in every respect
    Based on the following customer ranking: Value for money (5), Tread wear (5), Dry traction (5), Wet traction (5), Ride comfort (5), Low noise (5), Steering response (5)
  • February 20th, 2017
    Good value for money
    Based on the following customer ranking: Value for money (5), Tread wear (4), Dry traction (4), Wet traction (4), Ride comfort (4), Low noise (4), Steering response (4)
  • March 20th, 2017
    Great tyres for the price. Good grip in the wet or dry. Very easy process of ordering and delivery - fast.
    Based on the following customer ranking: Value for money (5), Tread wear (4), Dry traction (4), Wet traction (4), Ride comfort (4), Low noise (4), Steering response (4)
  • July 6th, 2016
    These are low priced tyres but I was surprised at the good grip (both wet and dry are fine) and how quiet they were. They were also more durable than I expected. Would recommend for those on a budget.
    Based on the following customer ranking: Value for money (4), Tread wear (4), Dry traction (3), Wet traction (4), Ride comfort (5), Low noise (4), Steering response (3)
  • April 18th, 2017
    only had them for about a 1000kms only problem was delivery...the company did not leave them as requested
    Based on the following customer ranking: Value for money (4), Tread wear (4), Dry traction (4), Wet traction (4), Ride comfort (4), Low noise (4), Steering response (4)
  • October 10th, 2016
    Do the job at a budget price.
    Based on the following customer ranking: Value for money (4), Tread wear (3), Dry traction (4), Wet traction (3), Ride comfort (4), Low noise (4), Steering response (4)
  • January 24th, 2017
    Based on the following customer ranking: Value for money (5), Tread wear (5), Dry traction (5), Wet traction (5), Ride comfort (5), Low noise (5), Steering response (5)
  • January 31st, 2017
    Based on the following customer ranking: Value for money (5), Tread wear (5), Dry traction (5), Wet traction (5), Ride comfort (5), Low noise (5), Steering response (5)
  • April 7th, 2017
    Based on the following customer ranking: Value for money (5), Tread wear (5), Dry traction (5), Wet traction (5), Ride comfort (5), Low noise (5), Steering response (5)
  • April 10th, 2017
    Based on the following customer ranking: Value for money (5), Tread wear (5), Dry traction (5), Wet traction (5), Ride comfort (5), Low noise (5), Steering response (5)
  • June 21st, 2017
    Based on the following customer ranking: Value for money (5), Tread wear (5), Dry traction (5), Wet traction (5), Ride comfort (5), Low noise (5), Steering response (5)
  • October 11th, 2017
    Based on the following customer ranking: Value for money (5), Tread wear (5), Dry traction (5), Wet traction (5), Ride comfort (5), Low noise (5), Steering response (5)
  • November 13th, 2017
    Based on the following customer ranking: Value for money (5), Tread wear (5), Dry traction (5), Wet traction (5), Ride comfort (5), Low noise (5), Steering response (5)
  • April 12th, 2018
    Based on the following customer ranking: Value for money (5), Tread wear (5), Dry traction (5), Wet traction (5), Ride comfort (5), Low noise (5), Steering response (5)
  • August 20th, 2018
    Based on the following customer ranking: Value for money (5), Tread wear (5), Dry traction (5), Wet traction (5), Ride comfort (5), Low noise (5), Steering response (5)
  • March 26th, 2017
    Based on the following customer ranking: Value for money (5), Tread wear (4), Dry traction (5), Wet traction (4), Ride comfort (5), Low noise (5), Steering response (5)
  • March 2nd, 2017
    Based on the following customer ranking: Value for money (4), Tread wear (4), Dry traction (4), Wet traction (4), Ride comfort (4), Low noise (4), Steering response (4)