Tyre MINERVA EMIZERO UHP XL 225/55R16 99W
Tyre MINERVA EMIZERO UHP XL 225/55R16 99W
Tyre MINERVA EMIZERO UHP XL 225/55R16 99W
Lowest Price

Minerva - EMIZERO UHP 225/55 R16 99W

4.2 13 Customer Reviews
Model EMIZERO UHP XL
Size ? 225/55R16 99W
Load Index ? 99
Speed Index ? W
EU Label ?
72
Availability
Out of Stock
Notify me when re-stocked
Product Details

Vehicle Type Passenger car

Usage Summer/All season tyre

Brand MINERVA

Model EMIZERO UHP

Width 225

Height 55

Construction R (Tyre of radial construction)

Diameter 16

Load Index 99

Speed Index W (max. vehicle speed 270 Km/h)

Customer Reviews (13)
  • January 23rd, 2017
    These tyres were fitted to a Lexus GS300 (2008) and the car's road-holding and ride comfort improved dramatically. Excellent choice and I'll certainly recommend these tyres to others.
    Based on the following customer ranking: Value for money (5), Tread wear (4), Dry traction (4), Wet traction (4), Ride comfort (5), Low noise (2), Steering response (4)
  • June 1st, 2017
    I have already written two reviews on theses tyre's and tyroola you can see these on review's .com I believe have you looked at your web page they are there
    Based on the following customer ranking: Value for money (4), Tread wear (4), Dry traction (4), Wet traction (4), Ride comfort (4), Low noise (4), Steering response (4)
  • May 4th, 2018
    Overall good grip tyre for what the price was and gets me to and from work fine. I turn corners pretty fast from time to time and they grip fine. Also do a lot of long distance travelling over 100kph and has been fine.
    Based on the following customer ranking: Value for money (4), Tread wear (4), Dry traction (4), Wet traction (4), Ride comfort (4), Low noise (4), Steering response (4)
  • March 30th, 2017
    They are great value for money. Pretty quiet and good steering response. I'm not very happy about the traction though could've been better but for the price they seem to be a really good option.
    Based on the following customer ranking: Value for money (3), Tread wear (3), Dry traction (2), Wet traction (2), Ride comfort (3), Low noise (2), Steering response (4)
  • October 10th, 2016
    Based on the following customer ranking: Value for money (5), Tread wear (5), Dry traction (5), Wet traction (5), Ride comfort (5), Low noise (5), Steering response (5)
  • April 20th, 2017
    Based on the following customer ranking: Value for money (5), Tread wear (5), Dry traction (5), Wet traction (5), Ride comfort (5), Low noise (5), Steering response (5)
  • May 6th, 2017
    Based on the following customer ranking: Value for money (5), Tread wear (5), Dry traction (5), Wet traction (5), Ride comfort (5), Low noise (5), Steering response (5)
  • September 2nd, 2017
    Based on the following customer ranking: Value for money (5), Tread wear (5), Dry traction (5), Wet traction (5), Ride comfort (5), Low noise (5), Steering response (5)
  • November 13th, 2017
    Based on the following customer ranking: Value for money (5), Tread wear (5), Dry traction (5), Wet traction (5), Ride comfort (5), Low noise (5), Steering response (5)
  • June 8th, 2017
    Based on the following customer ranking: Value for money (5), Tread wear (4), Dry traction (4), Wet traction (4), Ride comfort (4), Low noise (4), Steering response (4)
  • June 8th, 2017
    Based on the following customer ranking: Value for money (5), Tread wear (4), Dry traction (4), Wet traction (4), Ride comfort (4), Low noise (4), Steering response (4)
  • July 6th, 2016
    Based on the following customer ranking: Value for money (4), Tread wear (4), Dry traction (3), Wet traction (4), Ride comfort (5), Low noise (4), Steering response (3)
  • March 6th, 2017
    Based on the following customer ranking: Value for money (4), Tread wear (3), Dry traction (3), Wet traction (3), Ride comfort (3), Low noise (2), Steering response (3)